1. Defendants B, C, and Jeju Special Self-Governing Province jointly with the Plaintiff KRW 5,00,000,000, and those related thereto from July 27, 2016 to July 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was commissioned as Jeju Special Self-Governing Province E (hereinafter “E group”) from March 6, 2012 to March 5, 2014, and was reappointed, and was working for from March 6, 2014 to March 5, 2016, and was not re-commissioned on the ground of the expiration of the commission period on March 5, 2016.

By January 13, 2016, Defendant B and Defendant C worked for each of the competent G and division chiefs in Jeju City by January 13, 2016, and were in charge of re-commissioning the Plaintiff, such as performance evaluation.

B. The Jeju Special Self-Governing Province H group has the I group and E group. According to Article 11(2) of the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, the Do Governor may evaluate F's performance during the commission period of three months before the expiration of the commission period and re-commissions after deliberation by the steering committee subcommittee.

On September 27, 2011, Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province enacted the F Performance Evaluation Guidelines for the Establishment and Operation of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province H Group in accordance with the above Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province in order to determine whether to re-commission the F Performance Evaluation Guidelines at the expiration of the F commissioned period. On February 1, 2015, Defendant Special Self-Governing Province amended the said Performance Evaluation Guidelines.

The main contents of the amendment are to classify the musical evaluation from the musical evaluation to the musical evaluation, and to separately classify the musical evaluation from the musical evaluation.

The criteria for evaluation before and after the amendment are as shown in attached Table 1, and the main contents of the amended guidelines for performance evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines for Performance Evaluation") shall be as specified in attached Table 2.

C. Upon receipt of delegation from Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province conducted a performance evaluation during the commissioning period to determine whether to re-commission the Plaintiff upon expiration of the commissioning period. On September 2, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the performance evaluation documents, etc. by September 4, 2015, which included a summary of the revised performance evaluation guidelines as shown in attached Table 3.

The plaintiff shall be examined in accordance with the revised performance evaluation guidelines.