logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 28. 선고 2016두43138 판결
(심리불속행)이 사건 주식의 양도시기가 주권교부일인지 대금을 청산한 날인지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-54850 (Law No. 13, 2016)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2013west 3125 ( October 17, 2014)

Title

Whether the time of the transfer of the shares in this case is the date of settlement of the price for the issuance of share certificates.

Summary

(In calculating gains on transfer of assets, the time of transfer of the relevant assets shall be "the date of liquidation of the price of the relevant assets" unless there is any exception under the subparagraphs of Article 162 (1) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is groundless.

Related statutes

Article 98 of the Income Tax Act (Time of Transfer or Acquisition)

Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act Article 162 (Time of Transfer or Acquisition)

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du43138 Decided revocation of Disposition imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff

O KimO

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Imposition of Judgment

2016.28

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, the ground of appeal by appellant is examined.

Since the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents are not included in the grounds under each subparagraph of paragraph (3) or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3), the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act.

arrow