beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant operated the “D Research Institute” located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 216 and 217, and operated the “D Research Institute” in the same year from May 2013 to March 2014 and from February 25, 2014.
4. Until May, 400, the said research institute prepared an employment contract, etc. in the name of F working for the said research institute, and submitted it to the Seoul Labor-gu Women's Family and Dlimb Team, and tried to register the research institute as an institution providing psychological support services for parents' growth.
1. Forgery of private documents;
A. At around 16:00 on April 16, 2014, the Defendant signed the “D Research Institute’s office” stating that “2500 won, inspection expenses A:3, B:7”, and “1 January 2014, 2014” in the contract date column as “E” after having the said Research Institute’s employees G prepare and deliver a written labor contract between the D Research Institute and E in a computer.
On the written consent for collection and use of personal information written on computers, the Defendant continuously stated “F” on January 1, 2014 and “E” on the date on which the Defendant’s consent was used, and signed as “E.” As a result, the Defendant forged, respectively, one copy of the employment contract and the written consent for collection and use of personal information in the name of “E,” which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations. B. The Defendant entered into a labor contract between D Research Institutes and F in the same time and place as “A” as “2,00 won, “A 40%,” “B 60%,” and “F on March 1, 2014,” and sign the written consent for provision of personal information in the name and address column of “F”, “H grade I, 40, 421,” and “the applicant’s name and address on the date on which the agreement to provide personal information was written.”
The defendant is therefore entitled to exercise.