logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.17 2012가단119786
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 226,298,190 to Plaintiff A, KRW 1,206,583,218 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 8,00,00 to Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) D around 13:10 on July 28, 2009, 2009 (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”). D is the Ekiex Engine (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

ii)H driver's license and drive a G cafeteria in F in Jeju City, and drive a G cafeteria I driver's license and drive a broom in the opposite part of H driver's license (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff's license") operating a broom while driving a road near the G cafeteria in F in the middle of the bridge with one speed of about 60 km each speed of the two lanes in the Gu-Eup Myeon.

) The front part of the Defendant vehicle was shocked with the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle, and the Plaintiff, on the part of the Plaintiff vehicle, incurred the Plaintiff Company A with an emission frame of No. 5 e.b., and the Plaintiff B with an external wound, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff A is the mother of Plaintiff B and the denial of Plaintiff C, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 7, 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

C. The limitation of liability: (a) Plaintiff A and B, without wearing a safety bell, was negligent by Plaintiff A while having been on board the steering team of Plaintiff A while having been on board the Plaintiff A without wearing the safety bell; and (b) such mistake was caused by the expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, and thus, the Defendant’s liability ratio is limited to 85% in determining the amount of damages that the Defendant is liable for.

(The ratio of negligence by the plaintiffs is 15%). 2. Scope of liability for damages

A. In addition to those stated separately under the scope of the liability for damages against the plaintiff A, each of the pertinent items in the Schedule for Calculation of Damages (A), and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The amount of damages is the accident.

arrow