logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 01. 12. 선고 2016두51818 판결
(심리불속행)이 사건 부동산을 저가양도한 것으로보아 원고들에게 양도소득세 및 증여세를 과세한 처분은 잘못이 없음(국승)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2016Nu42502 (2016.06)

Title

(C) In the event that the real estate of this case was transferred at a low price, the disposition imposing capital gains tax and gift tax on the plaintiffs was not erroneous (state transfer).

Summary

(1) The Plaintiff’s disposition imposing capital gains tax and gift tax on the Plaintiffs on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff’s summary constitutes a specially related person; (b) according to the copy of the register of the instant land, the Plaintiff appears to have purchased the instant real estate at a low price; and (c) the Plaintiff initially reported gift tax

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act

Cases

2016Du51818

Plaintiff-Appellant

Red○ ○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu40502 Decided 06, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

January 12, 2017

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The ground of appeal was examined in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment below, but the ground of appeal was examined.

The assertion does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal

It is judged that it cannot be accepted.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow