logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.06 2018고단1035
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant, together with Defendant B, proposed that the individual broadcast was conducted on the Internet personal broadcasting station site called “F” on the ground of female players, and that Defendant G 19 years old in early September 2017 recommended Defendant G (19 years old) to work together with the purport that “it is possible to impose more money if a female is broadcast as a female trainee.” The victim consented to this, and thereafter, the victim was accommodated with Defendant 113 Dong 1303 and 1303 of H apartment at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si.

Since then, the injured party refused to make a broadcast with the knowledge that the above Internet broadcast was to be broadcast by photographing obscene acts of female performers, and continued to reside in the above apartment without going through the broadcast, and the defendant, around September 7, 2017, when around 02:00, 5:6 times the injured party's chests were flicked within the above apartment, and 5-6 times the victim's chests were flick.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. As Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crime prevented the victim from engaging in the Internet broadcast work originally planned as described in paragraph 1, the Defendants were to have divided the amount of sexual traffic by engaging in sexual intercourse with similar sexual intercourse and divide it into the amount of sexual traffic.

After proposing, on September 8, 2017, Defendant A installed G’s smartphone with “I” and carried out marting with “I”, and received KRW 70,000 in return for similar sexual intercourse activities. Defendant B driving a vehicle to go G to the place of promise with a male purchasing, and Defendant B engaged in similar sexual intercourse at around 20:30 on the same day of G, by making the sex flag of the purchasing male rapidly known from the French-gu Seoul Westerndong on the same day to the place of promise with a male purchasing.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to act as an intermediary for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. Application of Chapter IV Acts and subordinate statutes to victim G damaged photographs;

1. Article 26 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts A:

arrow