logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.21 2014고단4312
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 9, 2014, at around 00:10 on May 9, 2014, the Defendant reported that the sound wraped in front of the Defendant’s house, Gangnam-gu Seoul and B02, 112, was serious, and sent to the Defendant, and the Defendant Dad (29 years of age) was said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said to have been said

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement regarding D;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine (to select a fine, in consideration of the fact that the act of the defendant was an unfair infringement on the public authority of the defendant, and the result was caused by the injury to the police officer, but the defendant did not have awareness as to whether the victim is a public official or not, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the circumstances leading the defendant to the crime of this case, the defendant's depth is divided, and the defendant has no record of remarkably

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow