logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.05.22 2015고단818
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding four million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is operating ‘‘(C’ in the original, US, B(3) floors in Bupyeong-si.

The defendant from February 16, 2015 to the same year.

3. 2. From 23:20 to 23:20, the business had a female employee employed D, etc. as a female employee, and had the female to find out his name is unknown, he received cash of 100,000 won from the male grandchild who was unable to find his place, in compensation for sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic by allowing him to do sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of alternative punishment of imprisonment and the concurrent punishment of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the defendant committed again the crime of this case even though he had the same record as the sentencing reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act two times, considering the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case, business period, etc., it is inappropriate to view the crime of this case. However, the defendant led to confession of the crime of this case and the fact that the defendant again discontinued with his intention not to commit the same crime as this case, and other circumstances after the crime are considered as ordered by the decision of this case.

arrow