logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.09.26 2012노4004
상해
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant did not see the victim’s face at the time of the instant case, and the victim who was not suitable for the infant was injured by the spawn and spawn by self-harm.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant appears to have inflicted an injury upon the victim, and the victim cannot be deemed to have inflicted an injury.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just and there is no error of law.

The victim has consistently stated that the defendant suffered bodily injury as stated in its reasoning by selling the face of the victim's face in drinking from investigative agencies to the trial court.

In addition, the F at the time of the instant case stated that the investigative agency and the lower court stated that the Defendant was aware of the victim’s face by drinking, and that the victim did not do self-harm and was not in the situation of self-harm at the time.

The above statements are specific and clear, and there is no special circumstance to suspect the credibility thereof.

As evidence consistent with the above statements, there is a diagnosis letter stating that the victim was suffering from the dental - malutism, the Abes of Spania, and the open position of the entrance.

At the time of the instant case, the victim immediately went to the G Hospital by leaving the call taxi at the Defendant’s home, and provided treatment such as taking the H hospital by going to the G Hospital following the instant case.

According to the results of fact-finding on G Hospital, the victim's injury can be acknowledged in light of the fact that the value of the victim's satisfe is cut off.

In addition, according to the results of inquiry into H Hospital, the defendant is the defendant.

arrow