logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2012.11.22 2012고정408
상해
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2012, at around 18:30 on April 30, 2012, the Defendant had a dispute with the opinion about the method of paying the borrowed money at the D restaurant operated by the Defendant in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and suffered injury such as franchising and franing the face of the victim E (the age of 60) one time by breaking the fat of fat of the victim E (the age of 60).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of photographs) and investigation reports (a statement of a doctor in charge);

1. Each reference inquiry report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act stated that the defendant did not inflict any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning, although the defendant alleged that he did not inflict any injury on the victim, so the victim E made a statement that he suffered any injury as stated in its reasoning, that is, the victim E suffered from the victim's face because he met the defendant, i.e., the victim E made a statement from the defendant, that he did not harm the victim's face, and that he did not harm the victim, and that he did not do harm the victim at the time. According to the diagnosis document, the victim suffered "pat-pathth, pathth, spathth, and open place of spathn," and according to the inquiry of the G Hospital's inquiry, the victim's injury is deemed to have been damaged by the defendant's opinion that spathn part of spathn part of spathn, and that the victim's body's injury was not high.

arrow