logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.17 2014고단595
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 07:40 on August 20, 2013, at the defendant's house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul and 301, the defendant prevented the victim's D (the 32 years of age) from drinking alcohol together with the defendant's friendly E, living together with the defendant. However, on the ground that the victim's horse does not hear the horses, the victim's clothes are walking back several times due to the fact that the victim does not hear the horses, and the victim's cocons with drinking alcohol, and the victim's 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 6, 7, 7, etc. were cut down on the right side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. On-site photographs and photographs of victim D damaged parts;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to 119 emergency medical services performed;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that there is no causal link with the Defendant’s act since the pertinent provision of the relevant criminal facts and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the Defendant’s assertion on the Defendant’s assertion on the criminal facts, only he/she made 3 and 4 times the victim’s knives at her time, and the victim’s clives did not appear to support the victim’s vessel due to his/her appearance. The instant injury

In light of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the statements in the investigation agency of D, and in this court are consistent and concrete with the name of injury as stated in the records of the injured party photograph and each injury diagnosis report, so it can be sufficiently believed that the statements are sufficient, and the possibility of the injured party being injured or being injured by other causes can be sufficiently ruled out, including the above statements.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

The reason for sentencing [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury (Scope of Recommendation] In the area of aggravation (6-2 years from general injury) (6-2 years from general injury) [1-4 years from special injury] (decision of sentence] The crime of this case is that the defendant suffered injury, such as a uupup of cage, paths-pathm wave, etc., which requires treatment for about six weeks of non-discrimination violence against female victims.

arrow