logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.25 2014고정710
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant,

1. On January 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) lent money to the Victim B with no intent or ability to repay; and (b) did not pay taxes with borrowed money; (c) provided false statement that “I would have to repay 4.70,000 won as the amount of money paid is short; and (d) borrowed money to the Defendant’s agricultural bank account; (c) received KRW 470,000 from the Victim to the Defendant’s agricultural bank account; and (d) acquired it by deception;

2. Around 01:00 on March 10, 2013, a false statement is made to the victim C, that the fact is separate from her husband for ten years before her husband and did not have any intention or ability to repay the money, but the victim did not have any money before her husband and her husband but he/she had no intention or ability to pay the money. If 300,000 won is lent, she would receive money from her husband after this mold and receive money from her husband, and that she shall receive 30,000 won from the victim to her own account;

3. Facts are separate from her husbands for more than 10 years, and her husbands have no intention or ability to complete payment even if her husband borrows money with the knowledge of whether her husbands in China, but (1) around 21:00 on March 10, 2013, she must complete the payment of the credit cards of her husbands in Gyeyang-gu Incheon E-Ba 15:302, but 200,000 won;

5. 20. Payment of money to the husband from China

“A false statement” means a false statement, i.e., the victim received KRW 200,000 in cash from the victim, and defrauded it (ii) around April 23, 2013, at Gju stores located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, that “on May 20, 2013, if a person lends KRW 1 million, he/she shall receive money from his/her husband and receive money from his/her husband.” In this context, he/she received KRW 1 million in cash from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each complaint filed (C, B, and D);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

arrow