logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.11 2015가합563657
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

B, C, G, D, Nonparty H, I, and J respectively entered into a supply contract with the Defendant that the Defendant would purchase N apartment in K, L, and M (hereinafter “instant apartment”) as indicated below (hereinafter “instant supply contract”).

The purchase and sale price of Plaintiff B on December 23, 201, 1507, 650,665,000, 1507, 1507, 1507, 1500, and C on December 26, 2011, Plaintiff D on February 17, 2012, 639,395,000, 1607, EAST 1607, 275,000, and 652,75,000, 14, 1207, 645, 300, 200, 200, respectively, and 206, 208, 201, respectively.

1. After the conclusion of the "this contract" applicable to the customer proposal system, if the sale conditions are changed before the date of approval for use (construction) of the apartment in question, the revised sale conditions shall be applied retroactively to the "this contract."

( Examples of Sale Conditions - Interest without interest, etc.) The foregoing example of sale conditions may differ from the sale conditions applied actually to help customers understand.

At the time of the conclusion of the instant supply contract, H, I, and J entered into an agreement with the Defendant to guarantee customer security (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the following content.

Plaintiff

A, E, and F acquired the status of purchaser under the supply contract for the apartment of this case as listed below.

Plaintiff

The agreement of this case on December 23, 2014, the transferor prior to the date of the transfer falls under the terms and conditions, and the agreement of this case on the part of the plaintiffs' claim for the difference of the sale price according to the application of the discount rate by issue of the entire pleadings, where the sale conditions are changed to the plaintiffs prior to the date of approval of use (construction completion) as of January 15, 2015, when the sale conditions are changed to the plaintiffs prior to the date of approval of use (construction completion).

arrow