1. The Defendant: KRW 57,180,00 for each of the 114,360,000 for Plaintiff A and F, Plaintiff B and C, respectively, and KRW 50,005,00 for Plaintiff D and E.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are several buyers of the non-K and 7 lots L Apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case"), and MHousing Reconstruction and Improvement Project Association (hereinafter "the reconstruction association of this case") is a project proprietor who newly constructed and sold the apartment of this case, and the defendant is a construction contractor who implemented the construction work of the new apartment of this case under a contract with the reconstruction association of this case.

On July 14, 201, Plaintiff Nho Lake (127.96 square meters) (127.96 square meters) No. 817,360,000 square meters) on July 14, 201, Plaintiff D, June 15, 2011, Pho (127.96 square meters) No. 817,360,000 square meters on July 15, 201, and Plaintiff A (127.96 square meters) No. 817,360,000 on July 5, 2011, Plaintiff Qho (127.96 square meters) No. 817,360,000 on July 15, 2011 (127.96 square meters) No. 1010,000 square meters on July 8, 201, Plaintiff 10,010, 108.

B. The Plaintiffs concluded a sales contract for each of the instant apartment units with the instant reconstruction association and each of the instant apartment units as indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant sales contracts”).

The defendant, which is the supplier of the above display property, shall guarantee that the following applies retroactively to the case of a change in the sale conditions of L apartment after the contract:

- - Future -

1. Where the conditions of sale in lots are changed differently by square, Dong and floor, only the changed household unit of the relevant conditions shall apply retroactively;

2. The term "change of the terms and conditions of sale" means a change in the method of paying sale proceeds, provision of separate options items free of charge, discount of sale proceeds, and change of terms and conditions of loans, limited thereto;

3. It is known that the content of the contract issued for the change of the method of paying the sale price is retroactively applied to 5% of the down payment, 10% of the intermediate payment, and 35% of the balance due to the change of the "Article 1 (Supply Price and Payment Method)".

C. At the time of entering into each of the instant sales contracts, the Defendant issued to the Plaintiffs an agreement on guaranteeing the conditions of sale including the following agreements (hereinafter “instant agreement”). D.

The plaintiffs are the defendant according to each contract for the sale of this case.