The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On October 16, 2014, around 00:27, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant at the Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun; (b) as a matter of taxi fares, the taxi driver of the taxi boarding the Defendant; and (c) continued to have any dispute with the said D; (d) on the ground that the circumstances surrounding the victim E, a police officer belonging to the said district, were unbrupted to the Defendant, the Defendant took a bath to the Defendant, such as “this opening, farc, farc, bitched, farc, bitched, farc, and farced.”

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the statement of withdrawal of complaint filed in the trial records, the victim can have cancelled the complaint against the defendant on November 4, 2014, which is the date of the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.