logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.05.28 2014고정628
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On July 17, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Utilization, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.: (a) around 11:47, at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu-gu 1, B 1,001, B 1, 1,001, the Defendant informed him of whether he was true or not, with the thickness of the president of NAG, and whether he was responsible for the work; (b) the Daegu-gu G Gake, the concept of “(Non-Recommendation) no call,” and (c) G, Daegu-gu Ga, the initial social project, but the social project had the ability to deal with the other competitive site, and the Defendant started to deal with the Plaintiff’s bar bar, which was purchased and finished, due to the problem of the bicycle purchased by him, and then notified him of whether he was true or not he was responsible for the work.

However, there was no fact that the victim's G store operated by the victim has undermined, that the Spain bicycle is the main force, and that there was no statement that he will inform the truth and be responsible.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through information and communication network with a view to slandering the person.

나. 모욕 피고인은 위 피고인의 집에서 인터넷 네이버의 ‘C’와 ‘D’에서 닉네임 ‘E’를 이용하여 자유 게시판에, 1) 2013. 7. 17. 10:36경 “G 사장님께서 하시는 말씀을 보니 리콜의 개념이 없는 듯 보이네요. 본인의 부족한 지능을 몇몇 동호인과 동호인의 문제로 만든다고 가려지는 게 아닌데 말입니다. ㅎㅎ”, 2) 2013. 7. 17. 14:05경 카페 이용자 H의 글에 댓글로 “바본가봐요. ㅎㅎ”, 3) 2013. 7. 17. 19:28경 카페 이용자 I의 글에 댓글로 “정신이 이상한 사람 같아요, 솔직히 다른데서 저럼 귀때기 맞을 겁니다.”, 4) 2013. 7. 17. 20:11경...

arrow