logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.08.11 2016나61952
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “In addition, insofar as the warranty bond has been paid pursuant to the construction contract of this case concluded through the open bid and has been used for the repair of the defects of the apartment of this case, it is difficult to deem that any damage has occurred to the plaintiff even if the defendant's officers consumed all the money necessary for the repair of the defects in the five-year and ten-year new construction of new and the ten-year new and new construction of the apartment of this case. Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.” The part of the "payment" of the fifth and fifth judgment of the court of first instance is to be "payment........" The part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the assertion of the default liability or the return of unjust enrichment against the defendant B is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts.”

2.The height of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be as follows: (a) 6th 10 or 19th eth son of the judgment of the court of first instance.

C. 1) Determination of the Plaintiff’s assertion of the responsibility for nonperformance or the liability for return of unjust enrichment against Defendant B is a continuous construction contract that repairs up to 10 years of defects, and Defendant B is liable for nonperformance or return of unjust enrichment as to this part, since the Plaintiff’s assertion of the liability for nonperformance or the instant construction contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant B was the continuous construction contract that repairs up to 10 years of defects, and Defendant B did not entirely perform the defect repair in 5 years of defects and 10 years of defects. In domestic affairs, even if the instant construction contract concerns the defect repair of the instant apartment that occurred at the time of the contract, such as the repair contract as claimed by the Defendants, even if the instant construction contract concerns the defect repair of the instant apartment that occurred at the time of the contract, Defendant B did not perform the construction

arrow