beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant Dable Construction Co., Ltd. and Defendant Sk Construction Co., Ltd.
Reasons
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the second '2' part of the court of first instance No. 5 of the judgment, which is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
“2) However, Defendant KS construction failed to perform its duty of repair of defects, and thus, attached Tables 1 and 1-1 (attached Form 1 amended with the part requiring correction) to the common area and section for exclusive use of the instant apartment, and the table attached thereto, including the modified part, is the defect repair cost table below.
As stated in this case, "any defect that interferes with the function, aesthetic view, and safety of the apartment of this case" is "each defect of this case."
Although the appraiser did not separately indicate the cost of the outer wall part map in attached Form 1, the appraisal report submitted 14,911,025 won of the cost of repairing the defect in the appraisal report, it shall be reflected in calculating the cost of repairing the defect.
)In remaining and repair costs, 206,732,048 won, as stated in the table of repair costs (including the foregoing part of funeral costs in the third-year portion for official use) are 206,732,048 won, as stated in the table of repair costs (including the above part of funeral costs in the third-year portion for official use). - The separate repair costs in the standard for the second-year portion of map 32,894,349,349,349,54,544,545,586,47,486,486,486,486,486,486,47,465,486,486,928,930,626,611,786,10,420,457,67,670,6767,567,567,505,2586,2964,52656,7
2. The defendants' judgment on the main safety defense of the defendants asserted that the transfer of the right to claim damages in lieu of the defect repair to the plaintiff by the sectional owners of the apartment of this case is null and void due to a litigation trust in violation of Article 7 of the Trust Act, as an assignment
Dop. Dop.