logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.09.19 2017나2055078
하자보수금 등
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the Defendants in the judgment is modified as follows.

The Plaintiff, Defendant 1, Inc.

Reasons

1. Under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the reasoning for this part of this Court is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the second instance as follows.

All "Defendant Treatment Industry Development" of the judgment of the first instance court shall be changed to "Treatment Industry Development Co., Ltd." (hereinafter the same shall apply). The attached Form of the judgment of the first instance shall be changed to that of this judgment.

The six pages of the judgment of the first instance court are as follows.

[ table] 225,65,67, 297, 386, 30, 97, 297, 297, 397, 297, 297, 378, 486, 297, 397, 297, 486, 397, 297, 297, 297, 368, 486, 297, 297, 297, 297, 297, 297, 386, 47, 297, 297, 297, 197, 297, 197, 305, 297, 297, 386, 47, 298, 298, 368, 298, 386, 287, 2986, 287

From the 6th parallels to the 7th parallels as follows.

2. Among the sectional owners of the apartment of this case, the detailed details of the cost of repairing the defects of the household and the section for exclusive use by the household that did not transfer the damage claim in lieu of the defect repair to the Plaintiff are as follows:

- - - - 36,928 367,986 25,2192,527- - 52,522,605 - 102,42,42,605, 102, 102, 1204, 1205, 102, 42,42,605, 102, 104, 104, 105, 105, 102, 1204, 1204, 102, 1204, 1205, 102, 522, 60, 605, 102, 42, 604, 381, 604, 604, 2035, 219, 254, 268,

arrow