logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.06.17 2016고단394
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Injury;

A. On February 14, 2016, at around 17:50 on February 14, 2016, Defendant A’s injury to the victim D (at the age of 45) who was in Pyeongtaek-si E (at the age of this 45), he would like to hear the horses to reduce the amount of singing from the victim during the period of drinking together with the victim B who was in a large frame with his music, while drinking together with the victim B. However, when the victim was able to wear the head, booms the head, and booms the head, the head, and the head, the head, the head, the head of which would be faced with his hand.”

Before 14 days of medical treatment to the victim, two sides were needed.

B. In the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a), Defendant A suffered injury to the victim G, who was the son of the said victim DNA (25 years old), by cutting down the victim’s ebbbbbage, etc., and knee kne, etc., which requires treatment for about 14 days, on the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant A destroyed the property at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1(a) as well as at the time and place where the victim G was set up, boomed, and damaged one inner diameter equivalent to KRW 200,000, which is the market value of the victim’s ownership.

3. 공무집행 방해 피고인 A는 2016. 2. 14. 19:00 경 평택시 H에 있는 I 파출소에서 위와 같은 혐의로 현행범인 체포되어 있던 중 I 파출소 소속 경장 J이 위 파출소에서 소란을 피우는 B에게 수갑을 채우자 이에 항의 하면서 위 J의 오른쪽 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Each legal testimony of witness D, G, and K;

1. Statement made by each police officer against the police officer J or D;

1. Data of video images;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. The relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) shall be applied to the punishment of imprisonment for the crime.

arrow