Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the day this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are above one year each.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On October 2, 2017, the Defendant damaged the victim F (n, 55 years of age) located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, the Defendant: (a) was at the G main point operated by the G main office of G, which was disputing the problem of drinking value with the victim, and the Defendant was at the phone at a level equivalent to 50,000 won at the market price on the seat of the car main office of the car main office; and (b) was at the seat of the car main office of G main office of G, which was under the influence of the car main office of G main office of G main office.

B. In the above time and place, when the Defendant was faced with the victim from the above Paragraph 1 above, he saw the victim's head debt by hand, shaking the victim's head debt on several occasions, and he saw the victim's side interest three times in drinking.

As a result, the defendant got a scarcity of the wall after the scarcity that needs to be treated for about 2 weeks.

2. Defendant B: (a) reported at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, on the grounds that Defendant B sent out on the same ground as the above paragraph 1, and reported that Defendant B: (b) expressed a bath that “I will arrest his male-friendly arrest A, etc. by assaulting his own male-child arrest; (c) I would like to read “I’s face at one time on the hand, I would like to walk I’s bucks and the bucks, and walk I’s bucks, and walk I’s bucks.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Each damaged photograph;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV analysis and attachment);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Articles 257(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Defendant B who choose to imprisonment with prison labor: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. A aggravated criminal defendant: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants: The reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows, and the Defendants’ age, environment, sex, and motive and motive of the crime.