A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was engaged in the work of transporting blasting stones, etc. generated from blasting work in tunnels at the construction site of the tunnel immediately preceding the railroad uniforms in Gyeong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, with six other drivers.

The defendant thought that the rest of drivers, excluding himself, neglected to carry out transportation work and the defendant is relatively more likely to do so, and there was a very rough objection against it.

1. On October 2, 2014, from around 17:40 to 18:50, the Defendant interfered with business, at the entrance of the aforementioned construction site, interfered with the victim’s blasting seat transport by way of avoiding disturbance to the victim D company employees who are under the influence of alcohol at the entrance of the said construction site, and moving the spump car owned by the Defendant to the entrance of a bridge, which is an entrance route into the construction site, and blocking the victim’s blasting seat transport by way of parking and obstructing the victim’s entry of dump truck.

2. The obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the police officer’s report and withdrawal of treatment days; (b) obstructed the victim G’s legitimate performance of duties, such as assaulting the Defendant’s right course on two occasions, and interfered with the victim G with the victim G’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the police officer’s report and withdrawal of treatment days. (c) the victim G continued to refuse the said G’s request, which allowed the vehicle to be allowed to pass by the vehicle; (d) G’s chest to take one time at his hand, and (e) obstructed G’s chest’s right course, by assaulting the victim’s right course on two occasions; (e) interfered with the victim G’s legitimate performance of duties regarding the report and withdrawal of treatment days.

3. Around 17:40 on October 2, 2014, the Defendant driven an E- white vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 100 meters from the parking lot located within the construction site to the bridge front of the construction site.

Summary of Evidence

1...