1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is partly dismissed as follows, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are just in light of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to this court, and it is also identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition of the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to the court of first instance that there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2

The 4th 11th am notified “the Plaintiff,” and the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff on December 14, 2017, of the decision to extend the period of prohibition of departure from December 8, 2017 to June 22, 2018.

4. The 14th parallel "No. 1" shall be raised with "No. 1, 7, and 8."

7 Myeon 12 and 13 "after the dissolution of the corporation of this case" shall be as follows:

“The instant corporation, the representative director of which was the Plaintiff, closed on March 31, 2012, 80,000 days after undergoing a tax investigation from January 10, 2012 to March 23, 2012, and was dissolved on July 5, 2013 by a resolution of an extraordinary general meeting, and was liquidated on October 14, 2013.” Thus, the Plaintiff concludes that the Plaintiff’s claim for a change in exchange at the trial is dismissed as there is no justifiable reason.

(Gu office is withdrawn from the exchange change in the trial, and the judgment of the court of first instance is invalidated).