1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Article 4-2(1) of the Immigration Control Act provides that “The Plaintiff’s period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea is from November 24, 2016 to May 23, 2017 due to default on national taxes pursuant to Article 4-2(1) of the Immigration Control Act,” which provides that “from November 24, 2016 to May 23, 2017, the Plaintiff’s period of prohibition of departure from the Republic of Korea due to default on national taxes pursuant to Articles 4-2(1) and 4(1) of the Immigration Control Act, shall be “from May 24, 2017 to November 23, 2017.”

From the fourth 21st to the fifth 1st th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange at the trial is dismissed as it is without merit.