1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance do not differ significantly from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial of the first instance, and even if the Plaintiff’s assertion is examined closely with the evidence submitted in this court and the first instance court, the fact-finding and determination in the first instance

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or deletion of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the

[The part of dismissal or deletion] Two to nine pages 8-9 “Disposition (hereinafter “instant Disposition”) was taken,” and the period of prohibition of departure from April 19, 2018 was extended from March 10 to September 9, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant Disposition”) to “the extension of the period of prohibition of departure from April 19, 2018”.

2. The 10th page "Evidences 1, 2, and 27 of A" shall be "Evidences 1, 2, 27, and 29 of A".

3. 17. The phrase “after the instant disposition” shall be deleted.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim that was changed in exchange at the trial of the party is dismissed as it is without merit (the old lawsuit was withdrawn from the exchange change at the trial and the judgment of the court of first instance became null and void). It is so decided as per Disposition.