A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2017, around 15:30, the Defendant appeared in the Seoul Southern District Court 404, Seoul Southern District Court 386, Seoul Southern District Court 404, as a witness of the theft Defendant case of D (the above court 2016 order 5948) and opened the instant automobile door, and subsequently, the Defendant asked the Defendant to open the instant automobile door to the articles dispatched to the defense counsel.

The answer to the question “I have already become aware,” and that there was no fact that there was a conversation with the part at the first time.”

“Lergical conversation” for the question of “Irregy”

I reply to the question of “N,” “I do not have any conversation,” and answer to the question of “N,” and “I have any, at that time, any, the witness.”

“Sain-sain sain sain Sain D sain in the question “;”

He/she answers "at that time he/she would not have been exposed to the face," and he/she must at all take the fact that he/she was out of the vehicle.

It is essential that there is only four telephones, D CC calls, and there is only one time to answer the question.

1.3,00,000

The answer was made to the question called “Isday”.

However, in fact, in order to open the door of the F Truck owned by E on the day of the instant case, the Defendant went into the door of D, and the G, who is a car technician, went out of the said vehicle and requested the above G to open the door of the said truck, explained the site situation, and G entered the door of the said truck into the truck of the main owner by opening the door of the said truck.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory with a view to impairing D's reproduction in relation to D's criminal cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The application of statutes to the Seoul Southern District Court 2016 High Court Order G 5948, G 5948, witness oath, and record recording of witness interrogation;

1. Article 152 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the defendant.