Defendant’s innocence;

1. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant was present at the court of Seoul Southern District Court No. 308, which was located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, as a witness for a violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act with respect to No. 5230, the above court’s order No. 2016, May 2, 2015. The facts are as follows: (a) on May 2, 2015, the Defendant was present at the meeting held on the front door between 14:36 and 17:00, and was not inside with the Defendant in the front of the E bank; and (b) on the following occasions, the prosecutor’s “(a) returned to the agricultural growth before D 2 p.m. and returned to D 5 p.m. again until D 5 p.m. was in the future.

The question of “I will memory as if I were in the agricultural growth.”

I reply to “I, if the witness continues to be in the next (agricultural growth) of the E bank, as the defendant, and (the defendant is not in fact in D), to the question of “I swear that I do not have any fact in the future.”

The answer is that “at least 2 p.m.,” and “at least 2 p.m., d., d.

했는데, 농성장으로 돌아가기 전에 D 앞에서는 어떤 사람이 뭘 하고 있었는지 기억나는 게 있습니까 ,

The question of "A. B.A." is whether a representative person or not, the public official's labor union first made a reply to the reporter, later C made a reply to the reporter and later moved to the farming growth.

I reply to “I may be punished for perjury if I make a false statement.”

2. From the point of view of more than five market prices after moving to agricultural growth as the defendant before D, whether the defendant was unable to leave from the agricultural growth.

“I memory as we were in the same question.”

By replying “,” B from May 2, 2015 to May 14:36, 2015, to the 17:00,000, for the front growth of the E bank.