logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.07 2016누52783
국가유공자요건비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

12. The two pages "this Court" shall be the "Court of First Instance".

14. On the 17th 18th 17th 18th 18th 3th 14th 18, “The fact that the operation of the train does not seem to be particularly more difficult” is that it is difficult to see that the deceased’s stress was high in the process of performing his/her duties, since it was about five days from February 15, 2014, which was the fifth day after the transfer of the train, using sick leave from February 15, 2014 to the time of death.”

15.On the 13th page, the following shall be added:

【A witness F of this court, who worked as the deceased in the Seoulnan Police Station C District, stated that the proportion of the cases where the deceased’s work as a witness of the Seoulnan Police Station C District, was about 10% of the total document preparation work, and that it is difficult to prepare the deceased’s body with his body written off from the deceased, only one time, but the deceased stated that there was no disadvantage from his superior or her personnel affairs.】

2. The judgment of the first instance court at the conclusion is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow