1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

The reasoning for this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification as follows. Thus, this case shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Revision] Under the 7th written judgment of the first instance court, the term "this court" in the 4th sentence shall be read as "court of the first instance".

The "each evidence mentioned above" in the last 8th written judgment of the court of first instance shall be understood as "the results of fact-finding with respect to each evidence mentioned above and the G mental health clinic of this court".

The judgment of the first instance court shall add “assumptive with all these circumstances” in the front of the 11th page “General Examination” in the first instance judgment.

In the judgment of the first instance court, even if the deceased was issued by the D District Court auction on July 11, 2016, and there is no work performed as the auction site after sick leave and rest, it is reasonable to deem that the crime of fear caused by the deceased's being in charge of a new job and the crime of injury, etc. caused by his failure to properly perform such work, etc., are more aggravated than those caused by stress, etc. caused by the deceased's stress in the course of performing his previous work, and thus, the deceased's failure to perform such a duty may not be considered as a personal factor such as vulnerability of the deceased's character."

In conclusion, the decision of the first instance court is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.