1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

【The 7th page “(7) of the 7th page “......, the DL call tez, etc. was included in the normal range.”

8 Under two parallels, “The deceased’s private person cannot be deemed to be a cardio-cerebrovascular disease in view of the fact that the autopsy was not carried out and the risk of the deceased’s cardio-cerebral connection disease was low.”

Each "this Court" of 10, 10, 20, 12, 14 shall be considered as "the first instance court" respectively.

The 11th parallel 4th parallel "the fact that the risk of an illness was low" is "the fact that the risk of an illness was relatively low."

The 12th 4-7 literature states that “the Plaintiff did not have recorded it on the commuting card because of the characteristics of the deceased’s work, such as business trips, external events, and hostings, but according to the consultative body’s activities records and the statements of his employees, etc., the Plaintiff asserts that the working hours of the deceased reach approximately 63 hours and 56 minutes per week before the death, and about 60 hours per week averaged 43 minutes per 12 weeks.”

12. The 7th page "B No. 10 (a certificate submitted by the plaintiff)" is "B No. 10 (a certificate submitted by the plaintiff, and there is an error in calculation in the aggregate of some excessive working hours as stated therein)".

No. 13 under the 10th 10th 10, the plaintiff emphasizes that the deceased had worked continuously for 12 days from June 29, 2015 to July 10, 2015, which is the day preceding the death. However, as seen earlier, it is difficult for the deceased to entirely believe the working hours of the deceased as stated in the 10th 12th , and even if it is believed, the deceased has worked exclusively for 10:0 to 15:00, and the 7th of the same month was retired on the 16:00, and the 10th 10th 10th 10th , etc. of the same month, the deceased continued to work immediately before his death.