1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff, a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan") entered the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan") on December 20, 2005, entered the Republic of Pakistan, and stayed in the Republic of Korea by extending the status of stay for industrial trainees (D-3) on December 20, 2005, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on February 10, 2012 after seven

The Defendant, on December 2, 2013, “a well-founded fear of persecution” (amended by the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 10, 2014, but was dismissed on June 27, 2014.

【In the absence of dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and Eul's evidence Nos. 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate or not, the plaintiff received a intimidation call demanding money from the person who was not his name, around January 26, 2009, when the plaintiff visited Pakistan, which was the time when the plaintiff made the plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case was legitimate, and the leader thereafter reported it to the police one time on the plaintiff's house and the wall, but the police did not take any measure.

On June 2013, the plaintiff entered Korea, and around June 2013, 2013, the plaintiff found the gas station that operated the plaintiff's punishment and took robbery.

At present, Pakistan does not have good security condition and the defendant did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee in spite of the risk that the plaintiff will suffer from the harm in the case of the plaintiff's return to Pakistan. The disposition of this case is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

According to Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, "Refugees" means the status of a member of a specific social group or political opinion.