logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.01.16 2014구합14594
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On December 29, 2005, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan") as an alien of the nationality of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan") and stayed in the Republic of Korea after changing his/her status of stay to the industrial trainee (D-3). On February 27, 2012, 2012, prior to the expiration of the period of stay, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee recognition

The defendant, on December 9, 2013, “a well-founded fear of persecution” (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 Subparag. 3 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”), a disposition for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on January 13, 2014, but was dismissed on June 27, 2014.

【In the absence of dispute, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to whether the disposition of this case was lawful or not as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 and 1, and the purport of the entire pleadings was legitimate, but there was a dispute over the Plaintiff’s small and small and medium ia and ownership of the land, and the Plaintiff’s murdered around January 200 and his family members.

In particular, around February 25, 2009, on which the Plaintiff visited Pakistan, B, which is a smaller part of the Plaintiff, tried to kill the Plaintiff and to kill the Plaintiff.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to Pakistan, the defendant did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee despite the risk of suffering damage in the case of the plaintiff's return to Pakistan, and the disposition of this case is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

According to Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, "Refugees" means the status of a member of a specific social group or political opinion.

arrow