logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.05.29 2014구합21035
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on January 25, 2012 as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan"), and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on February 22, 2012, after entering the Republic of Pakistan for short-term visa (C-3 and the period of stay 90 days).

On February 4, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have a “equitable fear (see Article 2 subparag. 3 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees”; and Article 1 of the Refugee Status Act).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 10, 2014, but was dismissed on September 30, 2014.

[Based on recognition, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the instant disposition and the purport of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1, and 2 as to the entirety of the pleadings was lawful. Since around 1999, the Plaintiff joined a political party of “APPL” (APPPL) (APL), and was arrested by five members of “Sipah-e-Sabababa” (Sipah-Sabababab) together with a pro-hmba (Sipah-e-Sabab) upon reporting to the police. However, the police did not take any measure.

Even after the plaintiff returned to Pirmaal, the parent's residential area, the Sim-A-Saha member was called or found in the office of the plaintiff's parent. On February 26, 2011, when the plaintiff visited the house of a kind of friendly D, which is located in Hochia (Chichanni), two male who took part in the her uniforms, and the plaintiff and B were string the house of the plaintiff.

In the event that the Plaintiff returned to Pakistan, despite a well-founded fear on the grounds of a political opinion or a member status of a specific social group, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, so the instant disposition is unlawful.

related.

arrow