logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.06.10 2015가단24390
운송비등
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff, Defendant A, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, respectively, with respect to KRW 10,318,919 and each said money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the transportation business, and E is a licensed customs broker who has run a mutual intent customs office called “F.”

B. On September 18, 2014, E died on September 18, 2014, and the wife inherited the network E’s property at the rate of 2/9, respectively, by Defendant A 3/9, Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D, a child.

C. The network E (hereinafter “the network”) operated a licensed customs broker office and provided logistics connection services, such as vicarious payment of expenses, such as vessel fares, etc., and inland transportation request, for the convenience of customers, in addition to performing the duties of licensed customs brokers under Article 2 of the Licensed Customs Brokers Act (hereinafter “customs clearance services”).

Plaintiff

In addition, upon receipt of a request for the carriage of cargo from the deceased's licensed customs broker's office, the shipping company will pay the cargo in advance, receive the cargo, and transport the cargo to the owner. The documents relating to the appointment of the Plaintiff, the payment of the warehouse fees, etc., and the tax invoice for the freight freight ("transport charges") were sent to the deceased's licensed customs broker's office. After that, the deceased's licensed customs broker's office, the deceased's customs broker's office entered into the name of the deceased and paid all of the costs to the deceased's account from the deceased's final shipper, and then the Plaintiff

E. The Plaintiff continued to engage in the transaction upon the request of the Deceased for the carriage of goods from the deceased. The Deceased did not pay KRW 77,391,897 in total, including the transportation charge for the imported goods transported between February 2, 2012 and August 2012 by the Plaintiff, the appointment of the Plaintiff pre-paid, and the storage charge.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 6 through 9 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above recognition of the obligation to pay transportation charges, etc., the Defendants, the inheritor of the deceased, are the inheritance shares.

arrow