beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 63,008,311 as well as annual 5% from August 1, 2011 to December 24, 2015 and the next day.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On March 19, 201, the Plaintiff: (a) was hospitalized on March 23, 201 after having been diagnosed by the spatch typosis without any influence on both sides of the Defendant Hospital; (b) was hospitalized on March 25, 2011; and (c) was hospitalized on both sides of the spatch sponsing mission (hereinafter “the first operation”); (b) after the first operation, the Plaintiff complained of the spatch sponse on the left side of the Defendant hospital several occasions among the Dos during which the Plaintiff was receiving water treatment and pedestrian training at the Defendant Hospital; (c) the Defendant was hospitalized on the 10th day after being hospitalized on April 8, 201; (d) on the 15 and 22nd day of the same month; (e) the Plaintiff was hospitalized on the 1st day after being hospitalized on the spatch 15th day after being hospitalized on the left side of the Defendant Hospital; and (e) the Plaintiff was hospitalized on the 15th day after being hospitalized on 14.
On May 8, 2012, around 10 months after the Plaintiff, at the Jeonbuk University Hospital on May 8, 2012, the Plaintiff is also deemed to be infinites, which form the upper left part of the upper part of the upper part of the elb, elb, and the upper part of the upper part
B. On May 9, 2012, after undergoing a diagnosis of nautical miles of mama and the right-hand high-water inserting artificial insertings, the brusium inserted in the mission, which is the left-hand corner, and the brusization of the human mission, was conducted on June 15, 2012, after undergoing the brusation of insertings of the mission, which is the right-hand top-down pipe, and the brusization of the human mission, was conducted on July 5, 2012, and was hospitalized until July 27, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 3, 6, 7 evidence (including virtual number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. In relation to the framework of the first operation recognizing liability for damages.