beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 14,400,000 and Defendant Law Firm (LLC) with respect thereto on July 6, 2018.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff’s occurrence and treatment process 1) During the commission of a movement, the Plaintiff was faced with coaches. On February 9, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed from the Furinology and the Furinology operated by E, etc. on the ground that he was diagnosed from the thalinology and the thalinology. On March 5, 2010, the Plaintiff was diagnosed from E for non-blood and co-malinology surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
(2) After the Plaintiff’s blood test conducted on March 23, 2010, the Plaintiff’s blood test conducted on the following: (a) aviation DNA entity, aviation SSM entity, leuk-guropsis, leuk-guropsis, etc., were verified; and (b) hospitalized treatment was conducted after being diagnosed that overall red epidemiologic (hereinafter “simuli”).
3) Around November 2012, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement on the delegation of litigation and the application for provisional seizure against E, on behalf of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant delegation agreement”) with Defendant Law Firm (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and Defendant D was designated as the attorney at the bar, on September 26, 2013. (B) The Plaintiff’s father entered into a contract on the delegation of litigation with Defendant Law Firm (LLC) (hereinafter “Defendant B”) on behalf of the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff.
2) On November 24, 2011, H paid the fee of KRW 4.4 million (including value-added tax) to Defendant D. However, until April 2014, Defendant B did not file a claim for damages against E and a claim for provisional attachment under the instant delegation contract.
C. On May 29, 2014, H entered into a new contract for the delegation of a lawsuit and the progress of a civil lawsuit against E on behalf of the Plaintiff, and entered into a new contract for the delegation of a lawsuit for the claim of damages against E with the law firm I on behalf of the Plaintiff, and paid 10 million won to the law firm I. 2).