logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017나53253
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's claim extended by this court is dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In 1989, the Plaintiff received the transfer of a diplomatic mission, the left-hand high-quality high-ranking hospital at Korea University University Hospital (hereinafter “Seoul-Gro Hospital”) due to the crypology on the left-hand side.

B. On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff, upon the recommendation of the medical staff of the Gogu Daegu Hospital, was provided medical treatment from the doctor D, by visiting the Defendant C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

D The Plaintiff reviewed the left-hand CT and MaI on January 13, 2014, which was taken by the F Hospital located in Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and judged that there was an opinion of the left-hand cT and MaI on the upper-hand francing of the upper-hand francing, and that there was an opinion of the francing of the franced francing of the upper-hand flu

C. On January 20, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and received from D the next day the instant instant surgery re-culpted on the left-hand side (hereinafter referred to as “instant surgery”).

On February 10, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to a prior inspection, and was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on February 17, 2014.

On August 19, 2014, at the G oriental medical hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by non-alleypathy, Belgiumma (in the face of the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.g.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 5, Eul evidence 1, the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the Chief of the Seoul National University Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital suffered marine symptoms by negligence, which caused damage to the Plaintiff’s osalism by the operation institution, etc., even though they had a high level of care in performing the instant surgery, which is highly likely to cause damage to osalism. 2) Although the Plaintiff continuously complained of marine symptoms after the instant surgery, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had the Plaintiff undergo the marine test on the outbreak on February 10, 2014, and on the bridge.

arrow