logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.08 2015가단28971
소유권이전등기말소등기
Text

1. For the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointed Party:

A. As to each real estate listed in the separate sheet, Defendant B.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) died on April 20, 1961 when the network D owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

The co-inheritors are co-inheritors.

B. Defendant B obtained a favorable judgment on June 17, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive once it became final and conclusive on the following grounds: (a) as a result of Defendant B filed a lawsuit against Suwon District Court 2013Da10494 on the ground of the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession of each real estate listed in the separate sheet as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet by publication

C. Defendant B completed each registration of ownership transfer as of October 27, 2014 with respect to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet as the Suwon District Court Seosung Registry No. 166, which was received on October 27, 2014, and completed each registration of ownership transfer to Defendant C as of November 13, 2014, Defendant C completed the registration procedure for ownership transfer as of the receipt No. 178738, Nov. 13, 2014.

Defendant Osan-si completed the registration procedure for ownership transfer on March 3, 2015 under the receipt No. 39258 on March 3, 2015 due to the acquisition of the public land on March 2, 2015 by agreement on March 3, 2015.

E. Since then, on June 14, 2016, the Plaintiffs filed a subsequent appeal (U.S. District Court 2015Na19152) against the above judgment, and revoked the judgment of the first instance by service by public notice from the above court and was sentenced to the judgment that Defendant B’s claim is dismissed. Accordingly, Defendant B’s appeal (Supreme Court 2016Da32100) was dismissed on October 27, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap 1-15 (including virtual number), and whether all pleadings are taken

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, each real estate listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiffs, and as long as the judgment of Suwon District Court 2013Kadan10494 was revoked, which ordered the defendant B to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration, each real estate listed in the separate sheet is listed in the separate sheet.

arrow