logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.06.12 2018가단53408
건물등철거
Text

1. The part concerning the claim for confirmation in the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. Defendant B:

A. D Forest land 14,876m2.

Reasons

1. On February 28, 2001, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer as to D forest land 14,876 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”).

On November 9, 1981, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to E forest land E, 934 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant land”).

On April 27, 2017, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the shares of 1/2 of the Defendant’s land to F and Defendant C.

Defendant B installed a provisional building, etc. on the land of the Defendant around 1997 and has been residing until now.

The above building installed by Defendant B is installed against the Plaintiff’s land.

Plaintiff

The attached appraisal map, which is a part of the land, has a concrete package on the part 16 square meters in the ship which connects in sequence 13, 15, 16, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, and the attached appraisal map in the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 15, 13, 14, and 14, and 2,00 square meters.

Plaintiff

The “inboard connected in sequence 27, 28, 29, 32, 25, 26, and 27 of the attached appraisal map via the land and the Defendant’s land” is 31 square meters in size, and the attached appraisal also connects the Plaintiff’s land in sequence 29,30, 31, 32, and 29, or the attached appraisal is 13 square meters in size in size in the area of the Plaintiff’s land among the inlet gate gate gates installed in the part, and the part connected in sequence 22, 23, 24 of the attached appraisal map among the Plaintiff’s land and the part connected in sequence 17, 18, 19, 20, 19, 19, 20, and 21, each concrete retaining wall is installed.

(2) Around January 1, 2017, the Plaintiff received a prior notice of correction on the ground that he/she, in violation of Article 11 (Restriction on Activities, etc.) of the Special Act on Public Housing, in relation to a household building, etc. located on the boundary of Defendant B, in violation of Article 11 (Restriction on Activities, etc.) and received a prior notice of correction order and a charge for compelling the performance.

Defendant B.

arrow