logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.10.13 2014가합8590
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From March 27, 2007 to August 7, 2007, the Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 51 million to the Defendant in the manner of depositing from his own account to the Defendant’s account as shown in Table 1 as follows (hereinafter “instant payment”).

on March 27, 2007. 20,000,000 on May 8, 2007, 200 on a deposit date (unit: 5,000,000 on August 16, 2007) plus 51,00,000,000 on August 16, 2007

B. On July 2, 2008, the Plaintiff paid KRW 30 million to the Defendant in a manner that the Plaintiff deposited from the account in the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant payment”) of the non-party dives Sharpos Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “dives”) that the Plaintiff works as an employee to the account in the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “the instant payment”) along with the instant payment No. 1.

C. From October 15, 2007 to April 20, 2010, the Plaintiff paid a sum of KRW 25,900,000 to the Defendant via the Defendant’s name account as indicated in the following table 2 (hereinafter “instant third payment”).

<표2> 순번 입금날짜 금액(단위 : 원) 1 2007. 10. 15. 500,000 2 2007. 11. 5. 1,000,000 3 2008. 2. 1. 500,000 4 2008. 3. 10. 1,000,000 5 2008. 3. 17. 1,000,000 6 2008. 4. 30. 1,000,000 7 2008. 5. 26. 1,000,000 8 2008. 6. 9. 1,000,000 9 2008. 6. 25. 1,000,000 10 2008. 6. 28. 1,000,000 11 2008. 7. 25. 500,000 12 2008. 8. 28. 1,000,000 13 2008. 8. 29. 500,000 14 2008. 9. 12. 1,000,000 15 2008. 9. 26. 500,000 16 2008. 9. 30. 1,000,000 17 2008. 10. 15. 1,000,000 18 2008. 10. 28. 1,000,000 19 2008. 11. 20. 2,000,000 20 2009. 5. 22. 2,000,000 21 2009. 6. 17. 1,000,000 22 2009. 6. 30. 500,000 23 2009. 7. 20. 600,000 24 2009. 10. 23. 500,000 25 2009. 11. 10. 500,000 26 2009. 12. 23. 1,000,000 27 2010. 2. 26. 800,000 28 2010. 4. 20. 1,500,000 합계 25,900,000

D. On September 15, 201, the Defendant paid KRW 900,000 to the Plaintiff.

E. Meanwhile, on September 2, 2005, the Defendant is the owner of C 101 Dong 1802 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

arrow