(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.22 2016가단541525

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.22 2016가단541525

건물등철거

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the building owned by the Plaintiff and its ground (hereinafter “the building owned by the Plaintiff”).

B. The Defendants are co-owners (i.e., shares 1/2) of the building owned by the Defendants on the land and its ground (hereinafter “instant land owned by the Defendants”).

C. The land owned by the Plaintiff and the land owned by the Defendants are adjoining to each other, as indicated in the attached Form. The Plaintiff’s building and the Defendant’s building are used for Moel business.

F and G decided to newly construct and sell a telecom on each of the above lands owned by the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ previous owners of the land, and the construction of the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ respective buildings, thereby selling them together with the land.

The relationship between the acquisition and transfer of the Plaintiff’s land and building owned by the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s land and building owned by the Defendants, with the following table and the relation between the acquisition and transfer of the Plaintiff’s ownership: F ownership on July 7, 1989; the Plaintiff’s land owned by the Defendants of this case; and the Plaintiff’s land owned by the Defendants of this case, acquired the Plaintiff’s land on July 27, 1989; July 27, 1990; and H ownership (new construction) on August 11, 1990; and the acquisition of the Plaintiff’s ownership on August 29, 1990; and the acquisition of the Plaintiff’s ownership on July 27, 1990; and the acquisition of the Plaintiff’s ownership on July 25, 2002.

E. 1) On the rear side of the instant building owned by the Plaintiff, part of the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, which is a site used as a parking lot (such as to the extent that three vehicles can be parked).

hereinafter referred to as “the next parking lot of the Plaintiff of this case”

In order to pass the vehicle to its place, the attached Form 2 marks 1, 2, 3, 4, 1 among the land owned by the Defendants of this case.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2019.04.18 2017나33579

-서울북부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018가단102093

-서울북부지방법원 2021.01.13 2017가단117586

-수원지방법원안양지원 2013.07.26 2012가합6221