1. The defendant connects each point in the annexed sheet No. 4, 12, 13, 14, and 4 among the lands listed in the annexed list.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. Facts 1) The Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City forest land 8 leveled the ownership preservation registration on April 23, 1964 to the State. On November 22, 1985, according to the procedure for conversion of the area and land category change, Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu C land (hereinafter “C land”), the ownership of the same land became complete in the Plaintiff’s mother-friendly D, for sale on July 31, 1965 on the same day.

On April 10, 1996, the above land was due to the donation made by the plaintiff on April 9, 1996 and the ownership of the land was changed by the previous light.

C On the land, an unauthorized building used by the Plaintiff as a residence (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) is constructed.

2) The Seongbuk-gu Seoul E site for KRW 1,101 square meters (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”) is adjacent to the instant building, and is owned by Defendant, F, G, H, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO (hereinafter “Defendant, etc.”).

On March 10, 1962, the land owned by the defendant et al. was owned by the defendant et al. by the foundation P on April 14, 1962 due to trading from the foundation P on March 10, 1962, and the ownership transfer, etc. was changed on March 14, 190.

3) The instant building intrudes on the land owned by the Defendant, etc., and the actual state of the intrusion is identical to that indicated in the attached Form, and the area of the sunken land is 18 square meters (hereinafter “the instant part of the land in question”). The Defendant’s share of the land owned by the Defendant, etc. is 6/32 percent of the portion of the public land in relation to the land owned by the Defendant, etc.

4) The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant, etc. on May 24, 2017. On February 5, 2020, the court decided to recommend settlement that “The Defendants shall follow the procedure for registration of ownership transfer on the part (b) of the land indicated in the attached Table, which was owned by the Defendants, with respect to the portion of the land indicated in the attached Table (b) on the 18 square meters in sequence, among the land indicated in the attached Table, connected to the Plaintiff on the 4, 12, 13, 14, and 4.”

As to the above decision, except the defendant.