1. The defendant is innocent; 2. The summary of the judgment of innocence shall be published by the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in the instant charges is a person who produces an assembly-type panel construction work, etc. at the request of the prefabricated in the name of “D” in Kimhae-si Co., Ltd.

On April 24, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who wants to construct a building to be used as a son’s room at the above D office, stating that “The Defendant will construct a 10th, boiler room 8, and 45th, 200 square meters of the total construction cost, within 20 days per week.”

However, the Defendant was a person who was engaged in simple assembly-type panel construction without a construction qualification certificate, and was in a bad credit position since about 19 years ago, and monthly income was less than 1 million won, and even if the Defendant received construction payment from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to construct a house with internal structure and safety that can be used for long-term residence.

Nevertheless, the defendant, who belongs to this year, is the victim's price for construction, which is KRW 10 million on April 25, 2014, and the same year.

5.8.20 million won;

5. The sum total of KRW 45 million was remitted to the FF Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) designated by the Defendant, through which the Defendant was obtained on 22.1.5 million.

2. According to the records of this case, the Defendant is proceeding with the Korea Housing Construction Corporation (hereinafter “instant construction”) as stated in the facts charged.

It can be acknowledged that the victim E has suspended construction due to differences in the construction method and the delay of construction, etc., and it is necessary to improve the structural safety of the term construction part built by the defendant in terms of the structural plan. However, a significant portion of the construction work in this case was not executed according to the design plan, but it was changed as the construction was added to the construction work, and the unit price of the construction in this case was due to a lower point than 50% compared to the normal board construction work, and it is also readily concluded that the structural remuneration of the term construction part is entirely impossible.