1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties concerned is that the Plaintiff C is a pro rata child in the G Hospital located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “G Hospital”); the Plaintiff B is the husband of the Plaintiff C and the father of the Plaintiff; Defendant D is the doctor in charge of only the portion of the Plaintiff C; and Defendant E is the representative of the G Hospital.

B. As a result of the prior medical examination, Plaintiff C, as the first part of the 29-year-old first part of the medical examination, was subject to the prior medical examination at G Hospital from May 4, 2013, and there was no special outcome.

On November 2, 2013, November 22, 11 of the same year, and November 30 of the same year, when the mountain field inspection was conducted on November 30 of the same year, it was found that umbaculum has cut the timber of a fetus once (a light light light, n.e., n.s.) but there was no light-line in the event of the mountain field inspection on December 3, 2013 and December 11 of the same year.

C. 1) On December 12, 2013, Plaintiff C was hospitalized in G Hospital for only the leading portion at around 19:30 on December 12, 2013. At the time, the G Hospital was opened to the extent of 1cm, and there was an ordinary range of 144/minutes of the heart tap water of the fetus. 2) Plaintiff C was in prison for the Roytocin around 06:00 on December 13, 2013, around 06:0, around 08:20, around 11:00, around 12:00, around 12:1:00.

3) From December 13, 2013 to December 12:50, 2013, the heart number of the fetus was the normal range of 134 to 159/minutes. Around 12:50, at around 12:50, the rate of 89/minutes increased by 165/minutes, but was recovered within the normal range again. 4) On December 13, 2013, when the heart number of the fetus was reduced by 126/minutes from 126 to 90/minutes of the fetus, Defendant D administered the amount of the fetus to Plaintiff C, and confirmed the bilum bilbilum cable.

In addition, the situation was explained to the plaintiff C and the plaintiff B, and the plaintiff A was born at around 13:51.

After childbirth, the plaintiff A maintained 10 times or more of the heart at the time of birth, but sound.