1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is that the statement No. 25 is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiffs' assertion as additional evidence submitted by this court, and each appraisal entrustment result against the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency of this Court is rejected. The plaintiffs added "2. Additional Judgment" as to the plaintiffs' assertion emphasized or added by this court, it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) in the first instance judgment acknowledged that the escape from the military unit was occurred on December 13, 2013 at around 13:30. However, on December 13, 2013, the fact that the heart rate of the fetus was reduced to 89 times/minutes, 90 times/minutes, etc. on December 13, 2013. Since it is reasonable to deem that the escape from the military unit occurred around that time, Defendant D had to reduce the required time as soon as possible through the king surgery, etc., but it was negligent in delaying only the portion, even though the plaintiff C had to completely open the military unit around 12:15, and that the average amount of the fetus during the period from 10:5 minutes to 10:5 minutes before the first half of the first half of the first half of the first half of the first half of the year, and there was no error in the failure of the plaintiff C to perform the first half of the first half of the year.

On December 13, 2013, at around 12:50 on December 13, 2013, there is a sign that seems to have been an escape, such as the heart, the heart of the fetus, the rapid decline, and the rise in the number of times of the fetus, Defendant D determined the best method of delivery through proper progress observation and, even if he had the duty to implement only as soon as possible from the time of the occurrence of the symptoms of the expulsion, he neglected it and neglected it to leave the fetus and the mother only to the nurse, thereby setting an appropriate time for coping with it.