logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.05.28 2020고단2006
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 7, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on August 15, 2020 by imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the Gwangju District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 15, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who operates a stock company B.

1. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “The victim wanting to travel to Thailand from October 15, 2020 to March 5, 2020” at the D Apartment Management Office of Gwangju Mine-gu, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would purchase a ticket in advance and send a schedule and a contract later if eight minutes of the ticket amount are deposited.”

However, the Defendant received money from the customers due to defective financial conditions, once he received money from the customers, was operating the travel agency using the word “floiting” method, which is used for the issuance or refund of airline tickets to the existing customers, so even if the victim pays the airline tickets, he did not have the intention or ability to purchase the airline tickets and to make them available to the victim

Around December 2, 2019, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 4 million won from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: E) in the name of the Nong Co., Ltd. as the price for airline tickets from the victim and acquired it by fraud.

2. Around January 10, 2020, the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the office of the pertinent company located in Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, the victim sought 30 copies of Jeju-do airline tickets, and that, at the time of sending the subscription money from the purchase of airline tickets to the victim, the Defendant would purchase the airline tickets.

However, the Defendant received money from the customers due to the defective circumstances in fact, once he received money from the customers, has operated the travelr in the way of ‘the prompt name,' which is used for the issuance of airline tickets or refund business for the existing customers, so the victim has the ticket price.

arrow