logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.21 2016고정772
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2014, the Defendant was working for the Victim C (V, 57 years of age) and was working for the Company E located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the representative of which was the victim C (V). On March 2015, the Defendant sought that the said Company will be released from the mother of the said Company from the case of the said victim, other than the case of the said victim, F (29 years of age), and that he would be able to operate the said Company, but he would be able to retire from the said Company after the victim’s husband G would be operating the said Company.

1. The Defendant, including computers, has no right to manage the company website, and there was no fact that such right was delegated by the said victim.

Nevertheless, at around 17:00 on October 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arbitrarily deleted the authority of the manager to the employees registered as the manager of the company website (H) by the Party E, the representative of the company, from around the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building; and (b) made it impossible for the employees of the company to have access to the company website manager.

As a result, the Defendant entered illegal orders to the manager of the company website, thereby causing interference to the information processing of the company employees, thereby hindering the victim C's work.

2. The Defendant: (a) entered the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office No. 402, Oct. 4, 2015, and the thief Co., Ltd., Ltd.; (b)

The letter of guarantee stating the personal information of the customer in the name of the slip C (E. 57 years old) and the documents stating the details of the company sales and personal information of the employees in the office capitals, etc. were abandoned with documents owned by the company.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the document owned by E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. I certificate;

1. Application of the Act on the List of Documents Submitted to Defendant

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 314(2) of the choice of punishment.

arrow