logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.02.18 2014고정3430
우편법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the representative of C apartment occupants in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

No mail office shall open, damage, conceal, or remove a postal item in its custody without justifiable grounds, or intentionally leave it to any person other than the addressee.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on May 10, 2014, concealed 137 copies of postal items posted by post offices, such as collecting one postal item posted by post offices No. 105, Dong 1, Dong 105, through the electricity department leader E, etc. on the same day, on the same day.

2. Determination

(a) directly collecting postal items at the time of recognition;

E and F's respective legal statements and telephone communications details submitted by the Defendant are acknowledged as follows:

On May 10, 2014, at around 19:47:55 on May 10, 2014, the Defendant, who was driving outside, received calls from a third party (G) that, at the time of the instant apartment mail, a mail that slanders the Defendant, who was the representative of occupants, was posted, was in charge of an audit of the representative of occupants at around 19:51:02 on the same day.

The Defendant calls to H (I) and explains his own portraits, and the Defendant calls to E by the chief of the electric department E (K) who had been in a management office with a mobile phone (J) around 19:54:52 on the same day, and is extracted if there is no sender or unauthorized distribution of the items that slander B.

“. At the time, the telephone call is based on the witness E’s legal statement that “50 seconds” was the “50 seconds,” but it is insufficient to find that E, at the time of the said telephone call, asked the Defendant about how to deal with the instant mail when a post office is stamped,” or that it was made in the same content (E is the Defendant in this Court.

arrow