logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.25 2017나15927
부동산중개수수료 등 지급청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) adding “facts” to “after the 4th sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance”; (b) taking the witness J testimony of the court of first instance into consideration “each testimony of the J and I by the witness of the court of first instance”; and (c) taking the witness K testimony of the 18th sentence into consideration “K’s testimony of the witness of the court of first instance” as “the witness of the court of first instance”; and (d) citing the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (e) citing it

2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be dismissed on the ground that all of the claims are without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

arrow