logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.24 2015나4950
대여금
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and all other parts of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

[Supplementary or additional parts] Part 4, part 12 of the 4th page "Non-Support" shall be changed to "2. Non-Support."

Part 5 "F 16. 12. 9. 22. 2014"

Part 5, "The seal of the request for performance" in Part 20 shall be sealed as "the request for return".

In Part 7, "the first instance court" shall be added in front of "at a pleading" in Part 10.

Part 8 "The content of the request" in Part 18 shall be changed to "the Gu,"

In order to add "the defendant" to "the collection amount" in the second parallel of conduct, "the amount of KRW 25 million" shall be added and "the amount of KRW 26.5 million" shall be added "the amount of KRW 26.5 million".

The "26,135,900 won" in the third conduct of the 9th page shall be "26,136,900 won".

On the 9th page 6, “The above argument shall not be accepted as evidence is insufficient.” The defendant’s above argument shall be deemed to be without merit.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of the principal lawsuit is justified, and the defendant's claim of the counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow